Friday, June 17, 2011

ciudad guadalupe victoria

images Ciudad Victoria rv Park ciudad guadalupe victoria. Calle Guadalupe Victoria # 119
  • Calle Guadalupe Victoria # 119


  • chanduv23
    05-15 10:58 AM
    When the USCIS is doing mistake, we need to ask for fee waiver. If they are nog giving, we should not hesitate to take them to court and make them pay for it. Even one time if we can succeed it will make all the difference.

    Ok - any ideas how we can ask? What fee waiver are we asking for?

    We need to understand if there is a system in place for fee waiver?

    To get any favourable thing like getting fee back and such things, first thing is that they have to officially accept that they are doing this and that is the most difficult part. You cannot get them to talk so easily.

    Breaking the law is not acceptable - it can be from all sides, but when you deal with govt agency - it is not easy - there is a lot of beurocracy associated and it is not that easy as we all think it is.

    I understand the frustration among the community - but we must all collective channelize our frustratons into something constructive, positive and effective.

    thats why we need innovative ideas to deal with this.

    Come on EB2, EB3 - US MAsters, US Phds, EB1s , scientists, doctors, engineers, consultants, and all those ivy leagures - can you use your IQ and brains to help wiith these issues? Please post some ideas here.




    wallpaper Calle Guadalupe Victoria # 119 ciudad guadalupe victoria. Check theguadalupe victoria
  • Check theguadalupe victoria


  • Green.Tech
    06-12 11:29 AM
    got 1 friend to donate yest., he should be posting the receipt Id soon.. I have the ID but didn't wanna post myself to double count.
    Guys, please persuade your friends and coworkers.
    Thanks.

    Good work, add78!




    ciudad guadalupe victoria. of Ciudad Victoria
  • of Ciudad Victoria


  • newbie2020
    05-02 11:00 AM
    Do we also need to contact the Senate Judiciary committee for any of these bills yet


    http://judiciary.senate.gov/subcommittees/110/immigration110.cfm




    2011 Check theguadalupe victoria ciudad guadalupe victoria. quot;Guadalupe Victoriaquot; de
  • quot;Guadalupe Victoriaquot; de


  • despodude2002
    07-21 05:49 PM
    Any idea on how frequently such motions are voted on?



    more...

    ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria, 17-06-08.
  • Guadalupe Victoria, 17-06-08.


  • bskrishna
    07-11 12:42 PM
    I don't see what is really different. I am not talking about July 2007. I am talking about May or June bulletin 2007. Do you mean the bulletin on May or June 2007 is to utilize the visa so the dates are not the "real" date? Then how do you know Aug. 2008 move is not for the same purpose? Especially if this movement is caused by spillover.

    There is chance that CIS and/or DOS know the breakdown of categories by country now as against last year. That is being a bit on the optimistic side.




    ciudad guadalupe victoria. guadalupe victoria durango
  • guadalupe victoria durango


  • ragz4u
    03-08 10:33 AM
    Again, the link is http://www.capitolhearings.org/ then click on Dirksen 226 in the right frame

    Senator Specter seems to emphasize that he would like to get done with amendments etc. and to make sure that he meets Bill Frist's deadline of March 27th so that it can be debated

    Senator Brownback is bringing an amendment to extend J1 visa which apparently expires this year

    Will keep on updating as and when I hear things



    more...

    ciudad guadalupe victoria. Ciudad Guadalupe Victoria,
  • Ciudad Guadalupe Victoria,


  • gunabcd
    06-02 08:35 PM
    Looks like most people are scared because of some kinda assumption that the politicians are determined to screw Indians and so have given the common sense a back seat. When the PERM system came in effect did they force the old labor petitioners to file in the new system? I've never heard of a law/provision that made people file a new and the money and time spent in earlier filing was wasted. It just does not make sense (there will be a class action law suit, if it happens).

    So here's what i THINK: As long as immigration is accepting the I-140 petitions and you receive the receipt notice, you are in the old system, meaning your application is still valid and you are in line for GC. They will have to keep the old system running for the applications filed before the new system came if effect. This May 15/May 21, 2007/2008 cut-off date discussion just does not make sense.

    It's possible that if your labor got cleared(backlog or PERM) after the new system is in effect, and in the new system there's no need of labor, then your labor will be obsolete (or wasted), but as per the old system concept you haven't lost anything as you can still go for the next step and file I-140 in the new system (although that I-140 may get processed based on new points system).

    Looking at some of the ridiculous ammendments that have been added in the bill, i think the chances of this bill being passed are less than 50%, just my feeling.
    -Gunvant
    EB3 Labor filed Sep 2004
    Labor approved(PBEC) Jan 2007
    I-140 filed Apr-19-2007
    PP filed May-31-2007




    2010 of Ciudad Victoria ciudad guadalupe victoria. Ciudad Victoria rv Park
  • Ciudad Victoria rv Park


  • bigboy007
    06-02 08:26 PM
    True , hope it will relieve as house sees through it and will make life of all easier by making it amendments or even drop the whole law , We dont want it.

    But also can some one point to me to place where it says H1B is not dual intent , i could only find DUAL iNTENT for some students.



    more...

    ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria gt; Durango
  • Guadalupe Victoria gt; Durango


  • vvrmurthy
    09-01 10:21 PM
    Arrived in Jul 1999. Worked for a consulting company till July 2000 as consultant (client - a major computer server maker). Joined the client July 2000. Even now, same job, same designation. Luckily my employer applied for EB3 BEC labor (May 2004). Since it got stuck, my boss convinced exec mgmt to apply for EB 3 PERM in Aug 2006. PERM labor got thru in Nov 2006. PERM based I-140 got thru in March 2007. Applied for I-485 in July 2007. BEC labor came thru in Oct 2007. Filed I-140 for BEC labor and it got thru in Feb 2008. Interfiled and now PD on I-485 is May 2004 (EB3 - India).

    On some site there was a way to know how many are ahead of me, given my PD, my nationality and my category. And looks like some 25,500+ EB3 cases are ahead of me.. Some 10+ years... Honestly, life has more to it than a colored card... let us move on with life... I will not allow the card to determine (ruin) my life...!!!!




    hair quot;Guadalupe Victoriaquot; de ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria y Pedro
  • Guadalupe Victoria y Pedro


  • ashutrip
    06-22 11:18 AM
    Nothing so far. I keep checking the status of my application every day but its still "In Process"
    what is your PD?



    more...

    ciudad guadalupe victoria. Ciudad Guadalupe Victoria
  • Ciudad Guadalupe Victoria


  • rbms
    04-25 12:41 PM
    How about something like,

    If a person has stayed in US for 10+ (or 7+years) years and has filed taxes(verified thourgh 1040s), he should be given GC. No questions asked(other than the ones the affect security of USA)




    hot Guadalupe Victoria, 17-06-08. ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria,
  • Guadalupe Victoria,


  • diptam
    08-11 04:14 PM
    I've made some date changes to the NSC letter - rest are all absolutely same. It's good to know that this letter does NOT need to be signed by Employer. Lets wake up friends !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    From,
    ABC XYZ
    Address:


    To,
    Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman
    Department of Homeland Security
    Attention: Case Problems
    Mail Stop 1225
    Washington, D.C. 20528-1225


    Dear Mr. Ombudsman:

    Re: I-140 processing delays at NSC for Apr - June 2007 non-concurrent petitioners

    I submitted an I-140 petition for an employment based green card to NSC during the May 07. I have been waiting for more than a year now and still there have been no updates on my case. While the processing times on USCIS website shows that NSC is processing cases filed around Mar 22nd 2007, we have been consistently observing (on multiple tracker websites online and from friends who recently received their Approvals) that NSC has been processing & approving cases filed post August-September 2007 and some as recent as this year. While people like us are still waiting, people who applied recently are getting approval notices. This fact can be confirmed by Ombudsman's office requesting NSC to provide with the receipt dates for all the I-140 cases approved in the last few months. It's only fair that people who filed earlier are given preference following the FIFO policy of USCIS.

    This delay in processing and ignoring our cases at the expense of recently filed cases is causing us undue hardship. Some of members who are in similar situation who contacted NSC have received responses that our cases will not be picked for processing until our priority dates are current. But there are several hundred cases like mine, who have an earlier approved I-140 and have filed a new I-140 petition (based on a new PERM labor) after we joined a new employer and were intending to port our old priority date which is current per the latest visa bulletin. At the same time, NSC has been approving I-140 petitions and whose PD's are not current.

    Also some of the members, who contacted NSC, have received responses like "We are waiting for FBI name check to clear before we can process I-140 petition". It is clearly known that there is no need for FBI name check for processing I-140 petitions. Also, now that there is a new memo stating that if FBI name check has been pending over 180 days, then I-485 can be conditionally approved without having to wait for clearance from FBI. In spite of this memo, NSC has been consistently ignoring our petitions.

    Some of members who have contacted USCIS Ombudsman regarding this delay have received responses from the Ombudsman's office stating that they are aware of the delays in processing I-140 petitions. But till date, we have not seen any action on part of USCIS to address this issue in-spite of many members raising this issue during Ombudsman's conference calls and sending letters to your office.

    Lack of I-140 processing for non-concurrent filers has prevented us from receiving some of the interim benefits (EAD/AP valid for 2 years, possibility of using AC21 in these uncertain economic conditions) that come with an I-140 approval. This has resulted in us applying for EAD/AP's multiple times and paying for expenses associated with it.

    I seek your assistance in investigating in this matter with NSC and impress upon the center to complete processing I-140 petitions for the non-concurrently filed cases during Apr-June 2007. I also urge you to request USCIS to re-instate the premium processing service for all categories of I-140 petitions with no pre-conditions to qualify.

    Please feel free to contact me if you need additional information. I would appreciate your response and assistance in this matter.

    Sincerely,




    ABC XYZ
    Phone : -
    Email : -
    Address: -

    Your employer does not need to sign the letter. You can sign the letter. On section 12 of the form 7001 mention " please see the attached letter" and then include the letter to be mailed to Ombudsman's office.



    more...

    house Guadalupe Victoria, Ciudad ciudad guadalupe victoria. Victoria, formally Ciudad
  • Victoria, formally Ciudad


  • arihant
    08-08 02:38 PM
    After reading the op-ed by Pankaj, I had the following questions: Has the SKIL bill already passed the Senate? I know it is included as part of CIR. But, what happens if CIR gets thrown out?




    tattoo guadalupe victoria durango ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria#39;s face, $20 pesos
  • Guadalupe Victoria#39;s face, $20 pesos


  • rustum
    07-06 12:37 AM
    Dug it. Digged all the messages. I can only dig once. Can i dig more than one time.



    more...

    pictures Ciudad Guadalupe Victoria, ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria,
  • Guadalupe Victoria,


  • ameryki
    01-03 08:00 PM
    hi applied for 485/ ead and ap on Aug 1st to NSC. I received Ead cards and finger printing complete. But no RN's for any of the 3 applications and no AP yet :-(. Can't even find out AP file number since lawyer used money order to file.




    dresses Guadalupe Victoria, ciudad guadalupe victoria. Iglesia de guadalupe victoria
  • Iglesia de guadalupe victoria


  • nursekm
    10-03 11:03 PM
    Thanks ! But it still unsure how long it will take ....

    Concurrent filing can be done by anyone with approved Labor Certification. Schedule A applicants already have pre-approved LC.

    This means, that not only Schedule A can file concurrently but also others as well.



    more...

    makeup Guadalupe Victoria gt; Durango ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria, Ciudad
  • Guadalupe Victoria, Ciudad


  • needhelp!
    09-10 08:08 PM
    20000 more to go!

    Checks and bill pay please send to:

    Immigration Voice

    PO Box 114
    Dayton
    New Jersey -08810

    Telephone: (202) 386-6250

    Please post here when you contribute.
    Its great to see the progress and it encourages others to step up and do the same.

    WE CAN DO IT!!




    girlfriend Guadalupe Victoria#39;s face, $20 pesos ciudad guadalupe victoria. of the Virgin of Guadalupe
  • of the Virgin of Guadalupe


  • wandmaker
    05-24 06:13 PM
    ^^^^^^




    hairstyles Ciudad Guadalupe Victoria ciudad guadalupe victoria. Guadalupe Victoria is a
  • Guadalupe Victoria is a


  • Macaca
    06-18 10:51 AM
    Please post your concerns in Employment Based (EB) Skilled Immigration Applicants (http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?boardid=1042&threadid=314286&boardsparam=Page%3D3)




    komaragiri
    08-02 04:23 PM
    Hopefully they can as well speed up their process for July filers.

    Wake up Texas !!:)




    mallu
    10-01 01:54 PM
    Instead of wasting visa numbers , they should allocate to those who cleared namecheck and all other processing. Agreed, this might allow a person who started PERM in 2007 to get gc in hand in 2007 itself compared to a person with PD 2001 EB2 , applied I-485 in 2003 and stuck in name check. But it is better than wasting the visa numbers.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment