Tuesday, June 14, 2011

queen elizabeth first portraits

images Queen Elizabeth I, queen elizabeth first portraits. Queen Elizabeth. Her first
  • Queen Elizabeth. Her first


  • Leo07
    05-03 02:28 PM
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^




    wallpaper Queen Elizabeth. Her first queen elizabeth first portraits. queen elizabeth i portraits
  • queen elizabeth i portraits


  • gc_maine2
    07-19 02:06 PM
    Contributed $100 today, earlier contribution $50.

    Order Details - Jul 19, 2007 2:28 PM EDT
    Google Order #464374160968946




    queen elizabeth first portraits. I bet
  • I bet


  • sanju
    07-24 10:38 AM
    This is so out of whack. Employment based green card issue is not about India or Indians. Our issue is about America and us i.e. highly skilled people from all countries waiting for their green cards. STOP BRANDING EMPLOYMENT BASED GREEN CARD AS "INDIA ISSUE". Such an attitude doesn't help at all and it is a big turn-off for people from other countries. Let’s be mature about solutions to the issue.

    Also, people who give money to campaigns - Hillary, Obama or any other candidates, they are not giving the money to change any policy for getting green cards sooner for employment based categories. Our issue is not even on the radar screen of most "ethnic communities". And problem gets worst when news media, people like Lou Dobbs try to misguide the general public with their hate mongering propaganda - again with the objective to increase the value of his own stock. Often times Lou Dobbs will try to make it all look like "conspiracy theory" being hatched against American middle class - just to get their attention. For example Lou says that people from Indian American community are contributing to Hillary to promote outsourcing????? Hello!!!! Who is in the world is idiot enough NOT to believe that increased outsourcing affects everybody in US, including Indian-Americans. Sometimes news media will call Hillary as senator from the state of Punjab and other similar bull shit but catchy news items. And it is ok if majority of the middle-class Americans shake their heads in disbelief (because they are ignorant about the facts), as if a massive conspiracy theory is being hatched against the middle class. But people who have any common sense have the responsibility to think rationally and filter "real news" from news intended to increase ratings of a news shows/channels.

    Also, the idiots who give campaign funds do so to buy proximity to power to increase their own profile. People who give money to campaigns are SICK and corrupt. These people are simply taking pictures with the candidate or a politician (not a lawmaker - there is a difference) to increase the value of their own stock. Too often this forum has mentioned the name of Chatwal being close to Clintons. Guys, lets face it, Chatwal is doing excellent marketing for himself. I don't think he is as close as he projects and as most people think he is. The way system works, anybody who is ready to give $1000 for a campaign can get their pictures with the "POLITICIAN", especially during campaign season. And these photo-ops freaks do not care about anybody other than them self. Therefore, the so called "indian lobby" exist only in the imagination of people who read news articles that are written by paid journalists.

    About Cornyn amendment, this was clearly a party line vote. It had nothing to do with the position of a Senator on the issue. Did you notice that Sen. Grassley voted in favor of the SKIL bill? Anybody knows why???? As most people here may already know, Sen. worked overtime to derail the CIR. Because of that, leaders of the Democratic party in the Senate are upset with him on immigration issue. And thus, most democrats voted to oppose Cornyn’s proposal. That is how things work in the Senate – which is no different than the way things work at the any other workplace. Vote on Cornyn amendment had nothing to do with the stand of a Senator on an issue.

    So, it is ok if Conryn amendment did not go through – “this time”. There will be more opportunities in the future. The thing is, Democratic Senators like Cantwell need to lead in pushing EB provisions. That may help to easy out the partisan vote on such proposals in the future.

    Just my take on the situation.


    NY/NJ/CT/MA Members -

    Please write to Sen.HILARY CLINTON expressing your dissatisfaction or concern with regard to failure of Sen.Cornyn Amendment. It's critical that we as Indians get her opinion on this issue. She voted NO on this amendment DESPITE the indian lobby contributing to her campaign. Also its likely that she might become our next president.

    Obviously, Sen.Obama does not care much for Indians!




    2011 queen elizabeth i portraits queen elizabeth first portraits. Portrait of Robert Dudley, 1st
  • Portrait of Robert Dudley, 1st


  • ashutrip
    06-27 05:56 PM
    Congrats skillet! Really great news!
    Any march approval?



    more...

    queen elizabeth first portraits. queen elizabeth 1st portrait.
  • queen elizabeth 1st portrait.


  • santb1975
    05-29 12:06 AM
    They gotto




    queen elizabeth first portraits. young queen elizabeth i
  • young queen elizabeth i


  • santb1975
    06-06 12:58 AM
    That is awesome

    Amount: $50.00 USD
    Transaction ID: *1701P

    Please come forward and contribute guys!



    more...

    queen elizabeth first portraits. queen elizabeth 1st portrait.
  • queen elizabeth 1st portrait.


  • mita
    09-10 12:35 PM
    USCIS takes two steps(2 years) forward than takes three steps(3 years) backwards. When it takes forward steps, it confuses everybody by it's stupidness of approving later PD cases and than moves backwards after realizing it's blunder. In this whole process, we spend time analyzing, debating, chatting on what USCIS will do next but they throw all our logic out the window and go their own way. This whole process sucks!!!!
    You see in the real world everything moved 1 year ahead from October 2007 to October 2008. So in USCIS world also it moved by 1year.




    2010 I bet queen elizabeth first portraits. Queen Elizabeth I,
  • Queen Elizabeth I,


  • ind_game
    05-13 11:15 PM
    was ur first MTR denied in error?
    as per you, your I-140 was never denied.

    Here is the exact wording from NSC. I have deleted all the irrelevant matter

    For I-485 Denial:

    You are applying on the basis of I-140, Petition for Immigration for Immigration Worker, filed on your behalf. However, record contains no evidence that a visa petition has been approved on your behalf. Since the record does not contain evidence that a visa petition has been approved in your behalf, your application is hereby denied.

    For first MTR Denial:

    However, it is noted that the Application to Adjust Status was filed on July 2, 2007 and Immigration Petition for Alien Worker was denied on September 4, 2007. Your application was only pending 2 months before the decision was made on the Immigration Petition for Alien Worker. You cannot port once the immigrant petition has been denied. Therefore, your motion is dismissed.



    more...

    queen elizabeth first portraits. young queen elizabeth i
  • young queen elizabeth i


  • milind70
    07-11 11:15 AM
    Just did some stats on , did only for texas service center

    It appears that Notice Date is immaterial. As long as your PD is current.
    So, you dont need to worry, if your notice date is Oct 2007 and TX processing date still shows July 17th. They are approving the cases as long as your PD is current in PD order which makes sense.

    I see a case with Nov 12 2007 ND and PD of dec 2002 is approved.

    Dont expect any LUD's either, Only suprise email matters....welcome to america, card production ordered.....:D

    Yes that seems to be the case , I had a friend who could have applied in June 2007 but due to some documents issue applied in Aug 2007 under the July adjusted bulletin, his notice date was very recent but he suddenly got his GC(his PD was current). But he said no LUDs or anyhting of that sort just recieved the magical email one fine day. His case was at Texas Service Center. His PD was Oct 2002 EB2.




    hair Portrait of Robert Dudley, 1st queen elizabeth first portraits. of Queen Elizabeth I now
  • of Queen Elizabeth I now


  • wandmaker
    05-22 07:40 AM
    Come forward and contribute for your own cause.

    santb1975: Change the thread title to read as FUNDING DRIVE: Let us step up IV(I+We)'ans



    more...

    queen elizabeth first portraits. Queen Elizabeth I portrait
  • Queen Elizabeth I portrait


  • dhesha
    02-25 05:14 PM
    Yes and then they should process in LIFO order so people like you can get their GCs :p :rolleyes:

    What do you mean they should???? Are they not already doing so?




    hot queen elizabeth 1st portrait. queen elizabeth first portraits. Queen Elizabeth I by Evelt of
  • Queen Elizabeth I by Evelt of


  • ebizash
    07-14 04:01 PM
    Sig done too



    more...

    house young queen elizabeth i queen elizabeth first portraits. queen elizabeth 1st portrait.
  • queen elizabeth 1st portrait.


  • akgind
    07-13 10:31 PM
    I am in a similar situation, not a lawyer, but worried about my children's future and trying to do what we can to help everyone with the same issue. Can you provide details of the changes in cspa that you have proposed? CSPA and Dream Act are two channels that may benefit our children. If I can understand what your efforts are in respect of CSPA, we can figure out what we can do.

    Any assistance you can give to help legal age out children would be fantastic I sent an e-mail to Weldon's office for an update today as we are waiting to hear if he will use our legislation and get a co sponsor to amend the cspa




    tattoo young queen elizabeth i queen elizabeth first portraits. queen elizabeth the first
  • queen elizabeth the first


  • zoooom
    08-19 03:14 AM
    Bump



    more...

    pictures queen elizabeth 1st portrait. queen elizabeth first portraits. Portrait of Queen Elizabeth II
  • Portrait of Queen Elizabeth II


  • she81
    08-13 04:54 PM
    But why should we lose the PD that we've been hanging on to for so long. For all we know, they might retrogress EB2 next - with USCIS, there's no room to take chances. I'm on my 10th yr here and don't want anything to go wrong at this point.




    dresses Queen Elizabeth I by Evelt of queen elizabeth first portraits. queen elizabeth 1. Elizabeth I
  • queen elizabeth 1. Elizabeth I


  • validIV
    04-17 10:19 AM
    What is the visa or immigration status of a person who has H4 visa and 485 pending (has EAD also)?

    Can be either H4 or AOS



    more...

    makeup young queen elizabeth i queen elizabeth first portraits. young queen elizabeth i
  • young queen elizabeth i


  • khukubindu
    01-18 06:24 PM
    Hi,

    USCIS online status showed that my Approved AP was mailed on Jan 8, 2008. Looking that I bought ticket for travel on January 29, 2008 but untill today I or my attorney did not get the approval letter yet. I am under very mental pressure whether I will get it by Jan 29 or not. If I have to change my travel plan there will be huge cost involved as I have to change four tickets.

    Do any of gurus have any idea what should I do ? My attorney is not helping me. In my area (Washington) no infopass appointment available before Jan 29. Do you think walk in into the local office will help me even if I dont have any appintment ?




    girlfriend queen elizabeth the first queen elizabeth first portraits. Queen Elizabeth I#39;s secret
  • Queen Elizabeth I#39;s secret


  • badluck
    07-24 02:33 PM
    Are you talking about emplyment based or family based.. may be your wife sponsord you.. please clear.




    hairstyles Queen Elizabeth I portrait queen elizabeth first portraits. Shortly after Queen Elizabeth
  • Shortly after Queen Elizabeth


  • saimrathi
    07-06 10:59 AM
    USCIS has a section for Outstanding americans.. can we contact some of them with the issue at hand..

    http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...0ecd19 0aRCRD




    jonty_11
    09-10 03:02 PM
    Remember this is the October VB...so thisis waht is in store for teh next Fiscal year..Oct 08 to Sept 09....so be ready for another year of drudgery....

    Sometimein July Aug 2009, they will move dates again to prevent wastage..and again some lucky bastards will get thru...unlucky-always i.e. u and me...with continue to tread these forums....I need a break.............




    srgadi
    09-10 01:33 PM
    Contributed $100 just a min ago. Google Order #151408234928192

    Sorry cannot make it to the rally due to personal reasons.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment